JORR

The Journal of Orthopedics Research and Rehabilitation welcomes scholarly papers in orthopaedic surgery, physical therapy and rehabilitation, physiotherapy, neurology and clinic anesthesiology and reanimation.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
An investigation of the relationship between quadriceps femoris and hamstring muscle strength and balance in individuals with pes planus
Aims: This study aimed to examine the relationship between quadriceps femoris and hamstring muscle strength and balance in individuals with pes planus.
Methods: The study was conducted with 64 participants with pes planus, including 48 female and 16 male. Individuals were identified using the navicular drop test and the Feiss line test. Based on the Feiss line test results 29 of the participants had grade 2, 24 of participants had grade1 and 11 of participants had grade 3 pes planus. Muscle strength was assessed using the Lafayette Manual Muscle Tester. Balance measurements were performed using the Biodex Balance System under three different conditions: double-leg stance with eyes closed, single-leg stance on the pes planus side with eyes open, and single-leg stance on the pes planus side with eyes closed. In these measurements, we examined the Anteroposterior Index (APSI), Mediolateral Index (MLSI) and Overall Stability Index (OSI). The Spearman’s correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between variables.
Results: In the single-leg stance with eyes closed the OSI, APSI and MLSI were recorded as 2.39±1.18, API 1.87±1.10 and 1.10±0.64 respectively. A weak, statistically significant positive correlation was found between the MLSI values obtained during single-leg stance with eyes closed and quadriceps femoris muscle strength (rho=0.270, p=0.031). A weak, statistically significant positive correlation was also found between the MLSI value obtained under the same single-leg, eyes-closed condition and hamstring muscle strength (rho=0.293, p=0.019). In the double-leg stance with eyes closed, OSI, APSI, and MLSI were determined to be 0.98±0.53, 0.83±0.49 and 0.38±0.26, respectively. In the single-leg stance with eyes open, the OSI, APSI, and MLSI were found to be 0.79±0.56, API 0.54±0.44 and 0.42±0.35, respectively. No statistically significant relationship was found between quadriceps femoris and hamstring muscle strength with OSI (p>0.05) and with APSI (p>0.05).
Conclusion: Our results demonstrated that, in balance measurements performed in individuals with pes planus, only the MLSI showed weak positive correlation with quadriceps femoris and hamstring muscle strength. OSI and APSI values were independent of muscle strength. These findings suggest that dynamic balance performance, particulary in terms of mediolateral stability, may vary depending on task difficulty and visual input in individuals with pes planus.


1. Abu Jor, Lau NWK, He Y, et al. Effects of foot orthoses on lower extremity joint kinematics and kinetics in runners with asymptomatic flatfeet: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gait Posture. 2025;121:281-294. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.06.003
2. Ahsan M, Abualait T. Comparison and relationship of isometric strength, range of motion, ankle mobility in participants with normal medial longitudinal arch and flat foot. Med Arch. 2025;79(1):20-26. doi:10.5455/medarh.2025.79.20-26
3. Son Y, Lee KM, Koo S. Increase in lateral contact force in the tibiotalar joint during walking in flatfoot patients with reduced stiffness of the spring ligament. J Biomech. 2023;157:111711. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111711
4. Hande D, Aphale S, Shinde S, Ambali MP, Patil P. Analyzing foot posture malalignments in obese individuals. Cureus. 2025;17(2):e79373. doi:10.7759/cureus.79373
5. Ashnagar Z, Hadian MR, Olyaei G, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of the quadriceps muscles in pronated foot posture. Foot (Edinb). 2019;38:86-90. doi:10.1016/j.foot.2019.01.003
6. Chang RY, Yang WW, Ren Y. Lower extremity muscle activity during drop landing in individuals with flat feet. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2012;25(1):21-26. doi:10.3233/BMR-2012-0306
7. Chuter VH, Janse de Jonge XAK. Proximal and distal contributions to lower extremity injury: a review of the literature. Gait Posture. 2012;36(1):7-15. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.02.001
8. Sadeghi H, Allard P, Prince F, Labelle H. Symmetry and limb dominance in able-bodied gait: a review. Gait Posture. 2000;12(1):34-45. doi:10.1016/S0966-6362(00)00070-9
9. Morrison SC, Durward BR, Watt GF, Donaldson MDC. Literature review evaluating the role of the navicular in the clinical and scientific examination of the foot. Br J Podiatr. 2004;7(4):110-114.
10. Şahin FN, Ceylan L, Küçük H, et al. Examining the relationship between pes planus degree, balance and jump performances in athletes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(18):11602. doi:10.3390/ijerph191811602
11. Brennan L, O’Tuama A, Papadopolous E. Development of a protocol to measure hamstring and quadriceps strength using a Lafayette Manual Muscle Tester. Physiotherapy. 2016;102:e251-e252. doi:10.1016/j.physio.2016.10.305
12. Biodex Medical Systems. Biodex Balance System SD: Clinical Resource Manual. Biodex Medical Systems; 2004.
13. Barton B, Peat J. Medical Statistics: A Guide to SPSS, Data Analysis and Critical Appraisal. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons; 2014.
14. Field A. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. 6th ed. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2024.
15. Cote KP, Brunet ME, Gansneder BM, Shultz SJ. Effects of pronated and supinated foot postures on static and dynamic postural stability. J Athl Train. 2005;40(1):41-46.
16. McKeon PO, Hertel J, Bramble D, Davis I. The foot core system: a new paradigm for understanding intrinsic foot muscle function. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(5):290. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2013-092690
17. Lee CR, Kim MK. The effects on muscle activation of flatfoot during gait according to the velocity on an ascending slope. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26(5):675-677. doi:10.1589/jpts.26.675
18. Gribble PA, Hertel J. Effect of lower-extremity fatigue on postural sway. J Athl Train. 2004;39(1):58-63.
19. Hodges PW, Tucker K. Moving differently in pain: a new theory to explain the adaptation to pain. Pain. 2011;152(3 Suppl):S90-S98. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2010.10.020
Volume 4, Issue 3, 2026
Page : 54-59
_Footer